Integrated Practice
Integrated
Practice - One View of a National Initiative
The American Institute of Architects defines an Integrated Practice as:
"Integrated Practice leverages early contribution of knowledge
through utilization of new technologies, allowing architects to better
realize their highest potentials as designers and collaborators while
expanding the value they provide throughout the project lifecycle."
What
does Integrated Practice really mean?
Integrated practice leverages architects' intellectual and physical
resources at their highest value using the best tools sets and process
available. The sharing of knowledge requires communication. Reading
this page requires the use of communicating standards set by the
English language. Information shared through the English language
allows us to function as an integrated team.
Integration has always been an element of architecture. Some
design is more integrated than others. That will always be the case.
Architects are masters at being able to process a large amount of
information on projects. Today with Building Information Modeling (BIM)
and other tools integration of data and images is possible in a way
that enables fundamentally improved results from a fully Integrated
practice.
Like language and hand drawing, CAD will be part of an
architect's integrated practice for the foreseeable future. However,
architects who add a BIM tool set to their practice can provide a
higher level of integration for clients who are demanding more holistic
design results. At this precarious time in world history, the sooner
architects are fully integrated, the sooner they can fulfill their
age-old mission of providing the highest design service for today's
expanding population.
Proprietary
Standards
Software vendors have provided us with digital tools. These
proprietary tools are "integrated" within themselves, keeping users
loyal to that particular tool. The business model of many proprietary
software solutions is to keep customers for as long as possible and
make it expensive and difficult to switch to a competitor's solution.
A typical approach of proprietary software is to claim they
are the industry standard and encourage users to standardize on one
tool or set of tools from that vendor. From a user's perspective this
could be valuable, but is a shortsighted approach. As users of various
software solutions try and integrate these tools true integration
becomes increasingly difficult due to various camps splitting up on
which tools are the "right" tools. It is difficult to get true
integration with software built on proprietary standards. If a secret
formula is needed to make paper or ink, the proprietary standards of
that process would limit the maximum benefit of these tools. Only those
with the secret formula would be able to communicate. Many of the
problems we have today on non-integration and non-interoperability stem
from competing proprietary standards.
Transform
the Practice of Architecture with Open Standards
The New Industry Standard is "open standards." No single BIM
application should monopolize the definition of standards, no matter
how large, dominant or great their solutions. The only way to get true
integration and interoperability is with open standards. As BIM use
matures, thousands of interfaces to view and edit BIM data will become
available. Tools that allow non-BIM users to edit some of the BIM data
will become available. The end user does not always need to
understand what BIM is to interact with the data.
I argue that the future of architecture relies on architects
demanding open standards from our vendors and understanding the
implications of the alternative. Otherwise, integrated practice of the
21st century and architecture will not survive. Any vendor saying they
"are the industry standard" is not a good sign since they could become
the de-facto standard. A de-facto standard that is owned by one vendor
is not an open standard and therefore bad for the industry and our
future.
With integration and interoperability becoming better
understood, there is too much opportunity in this momentum to let a
single vendor set standards. Open standards encourage competition that
supports collaboration and high level solutions. Development of
powerful software tools is not limited to those who know the secret
formula. Open standards encourage open competition, which can be
threatening to any established industry.
Why
Standards for Architecture?
As architects we share information between consultants,
engineers, clients and the world. The initial reaction to share
information between multiple users or organizations is to standardize
on a single vendor and a single model, requiring the project team to
use ____CAD for the project. The problem with this approach is that
communicating between teams that use other vendor tools becomes
increasingly more complicated and costly over time. The answer to this
problem is to have a common, open standard to share information.
The Internet is built on standards. These standards allow
using software like Internet Explorer or Firefox and making data
access without needing to know anything about the server or what
databases the server is using. A Google query gives many links. The
query and results are possible due to standards. Imagine the web
requiring a different piece of software for each website. The beauty of
the Internet is that it is built on these open standards and it does
not dictate the use of any one tool or any one platform to interact
with it.
The
New and Integrated Reality
Imagine a world where information and knowledge are easily
accessed and not limited by the types of tools used to get to that
information. This world is already evolving with the open standards due
to the Internet. Extending this capability to support the building
industry creates a new integrated reality for architecture. In the
past, architects were the master builders at the center of the design
and construction process; integrating the entire project and team. The
reality today and the potential of integrated teams is to move from the
"master builder" approach to one of linked teams and knowledge centers.
Although it is possible to have one central "super BIM" of a project,
the larger potential is to have integrated models that are referenced
to each other. The Internet is not "one server," but a distributed
network of servers. Data and knowledge about our built environment or
single project should be distributed in a similar manner, using open
standards.
The
Value of Integrated Knowledge
In this information centric world, data and knowledge that is
integrated is of huge value. Businesses on the internet make fortunes
out of such integration. This is evident with the evolution of banking,
travel, real estate and the list goes on. The open standards of the
internet have fostered user interfaces to view and interact with
information, a process not possible in the past. The use of most of
these interfaces requires little or no training and no proprietary
software. The faster we as architects can "get our information
integrated" and accessible to wider audiences outside the IT department
of our firms, the more value we will generate for the industry and
ourselves. The choice is ours. The technology is there. The time is
right to integrate.
Kimon G. Onuma, AIA
January 31, 2007
References:
National BIM
Standards (NBIMS)
"A committee of the National Institute for Building Sciences
(NIBS) Facility Information Council (FIC). Since 1992 the FIC mission
has been to "improve the performance of facilities over their full
life-cycle by fostering common and open standards and an integrated
life-cycle information model for the A/E/C & FM industry. The
NBIMS Committee continues this tradition by knitting together the
broadest and deepest constituency ever assembled for the purpose of
creating an open National standard for using BIM efficiently to empower
building processes. The NBIMS Charter spells out the vision and
describes the results NBIMS expects to achieve."
http://facilityinformationcouncil.org/bim/about.php
Open
Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
"An international industry consortium of 336 companies,
government agencies and universities participating in a consensus
process to develop publicly available interface specifications. OpenGISŪ Specifications support interoperable solutions that "geo-enable" the
Web, wireless and location-based services, and mainstream IT. The
specifications empower technology developers to make complex spatial
information and services accessible and useful with all kinds of
applications."
http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc
OGC white papers on interoperability and open standards:
http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/papers
GSA BIM Guide
"For all major projects (prospectus-level) receiving design
funding in Fiscal Year 2007 and beyond, GSA will require spatial
program BIMs be the minimum requirements for submission to OCA for
Final Concept approvals by the PBS Commissioner and the Chief
Architect. At the same time, all GSA projects are encouraged
to deploy mature 3D, 4D, and BIM technologies, spatial program
validation and beyond, at strategic project phases in support of
specific project challenges."
http://GSA.gov/bim
Construction
Users Roundtable (CURT) Report:
Collaboration, Integrated Information and the Project
Lifecycle in Building Design, Construction and Operation
"The Committee concluded that the difficulties experienced in
typical construction projects, including those identified by CURT
members, are artifacts of a construction process fraught by lack of
cooperation and poor information integration. The goal of everyone in
the industry should be better, faster, more capable project delivery
created by fully integrated, collaborative teams."
http://onuma.com/short.php?s=k35uwh1t
National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Report on: Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the
U.S. Capital Facilities Industry
http://onuma.com/short.php?s=2jle22gr
AIA
Integrated Practice
http://aia.org/ip_default
AIA
Integrated Practice Report
Twenty First Century Practitioner - Transformed by Process not Software
http://onuma.com/short.php?s=b6kwes34
2009-10-26 13:57:59 |